Ethical Issues Associated with Psychological Testing
One ethical issue associated with psychological testing is informed
consent, which means that a patient or client must give his or her consent to
be tested on. He or she can also, at any
time, withdraw consent. The psychologist
performing the testing must explain to the subject, in language that he or she
can understand, what the test entails.
Informed consent is extremely important in the world of psychological
testing. It is both ethical for the
client to be informed, but may also cause legal problems within a psychological
institute if informed consent is not obtained. There are exceptions to this
issue such legally mandated assessments and job seeker assessments (Hogan,
2007). This may make it harder for a psychologist
because some people may not consent even though it is in his or her best
interest.
A second ethical issue is confidentiality, which entails that the test
results cannot be shared with anyone unless the client gives consent, and even
then the information may only be shared with a qualified professional. The test results are to only be used for that
which the test was purposed for.
Confidentiality is extremely important and gives great credit to the
field of psychological testing. The
field would not be where it is today if confidentiality had not been taken
seriously. Clients would not trust
psychologists if confidentiality was not upheld. The only way a psychologist is allowed to
break confidentiality is if he or she believes that the client or someone else
is in great danger.
Legal Issues Associated with Psychological TestingA second legal issue associated
with psychological testing is discrimination.
A psychologist may not implement psychological testing on an individual
if the results will be biased based on the individuals race, gender, national
origin, or religion. Hogan describes the
term discriminant validity as “evidence showing that performance on a test has
a relatively low correlation with measures of constructs expected to have a low
correlation with the trait of interest” (Hogan, 2007, p. 653). Psychologists have to be careful when dealing
with their patients and cover themselves by making sure that they can prove the
test to valid and possibly job related.
Once legal issue associated with
psychological testing is disabilities and the accommodations that psychologists
must make to ensure that disabled people are being treated fairly. “Disabled” is a broad term and does not only
include physical handicapped.
Psychological testing must be modifiable to accommodate disabilities,
which may include larger print text. One
accommodation that has stirred a lot of controversy is the extending of time
limits on tests (Hogan, 2007). This is a
matter of the individual and whether or not it is actually making the test fair
by extending the time limit. Hogan
(2007) states that accommodations made to tests should render the norms and
validity of the test the same for non-disabled and disabled examinees. Both of these legal issues make the world
of psychological testing more complex but only for the better of the
examinees. All people should be treated
fairly, which is ultimately what these laws are in place for.
Civil Rights Act of 1964
In my
opinion the Civil Rights Act of 1964 had the largest impact on the field of psychological
testing. This was a turning point for
America and psychological testing, which gives all citizens equal protection
under the law. The Civil Rights act has
also been popularly called the Equal Employment Opportunity Act. This was because psychological testing could
have been and can still be used to exclude certain races or genders from
getting or keeping a job. The law
protects people from psychological testing that may exclude them from certain
opportunities such as jobs, property, or liberty. This law gave minorities ground the stand on
when it came to standing up for themselves and making a way for them in the
world. In regards to psychological
testing it has put boundaries on the logic behind tests so that they must be
standardized to not exclude any race, religion, gender, or nationality. The Civil Rights Act ensures that
psychological testing cannot be used against the best interest of a person,
which gives clients confidence that psychological testing will be for their
benefit. Personally, I like the feeling
of knowing that I will not be assessed in any way that would show my race or
gender.
References
Hogan, T. P. (2007). Psychological testing: A practical introduction (2nd
ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.