Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Major Approaches to Clinical Psychology

Obsessive-compulsive disorder will be defined and examined in relation to psychological approaches: psychodynamic, cognitive-behavioral, humanistic, and family systems.  The philosophical origins of each approach will be discussed in addition to identifying the goals of each approach.  The techniques and strategies of each approach will be explained.  The affects of the approaches will be discussed in relation to OCD treatment strategies.  Also, the effectiveness of each approach in relation to OCD, which will be based on treatment outcome research. 

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

The International OCD Foundation defines OCD as “a disorder of the brain and behavior. OCD causes severe anxiety in those affected. OCD involves both obsessions and compulsions that take a lot of time and get in the way of important activities the person values” (2012).  OCD can cause uncontrollable fears which causes the person difficulty functioning in everyday life.  An individual suffering from OCD is preoccupied with perfection, control, detail, lists, organization, order, rules, and schedules. 

The Psychodynamic Approach

The psychodynamic approach originated from Sigmund Freud’s work.  The psychodynamic approach is derived from Freud’s psychoanalytic theory.  The approach has since been challenged, broadened, and adapted. The psychodynamic approach to OCD focuses on the anal developmental stage, which consists of the tasks learned during toilet-training such as learning self-control and staying clean (Hansell & Damour, 2008).  There are three defense mechanisms, which are reaction formation, undoing, and isolation of affect.  Reaction formation is when an individual turns a negative impulse into a positive, or more acceptable, reaction.  Undoing is when an individual uses behaviors to counteract his or her inappropriate feelings.  Isolation of affect is when the individual separates his or her thoughts or feelings to distance him or her from negative emotions. 

Freud believed that people with OCD used a defense mechanism known as fixation, which he defined as a “permanent attachment of the libido onto an earlier, more primitive stage of development” (as cited by Feist & Feist, 2009, p. 36).  For example, an individual with a fixation on eating or smoking may have a fixation with the oral stage of development. 

The psychodynamic approach suggests several treatment options, which are free association (talking openly with therapist), resistance (using defense mechanisms), transference (how the client feels about the therapist), countertransference (how the therapist feels about the patient), interpretation (comments from the therapist about the clients emotional conflicts), and working through (the clients progressive mastery over feelings and conflicts from speaking with the therapist) (Hansell & Damour, 2008). 

The Cognitive-Behavioral Approach

The cognitive-behavioral approach originated on the principals of learning and also stems from conditioning research carried out by Skinner, Watson, Hull, Thorndike, James, Pavlov, among others and  academic experimental psychology (Plante, 2011). The cognitive-behavioral approach tends to focus on observable and non-observable behavior learned through conditioning (Plante, 2011).  The goal of the cognitive-behavior approach, unlike the psychodynamic approach, is to focus more on the present behavior rather than pats behaviors to understand and treat OCD. 

There are several techniques used in the cognitive-behavioral approach such as contingency management, counterconditioning, exposure, behavioral contract, participant modeling, behavioral rehearsal, and thought stopping.  Contingency management is changing the behavior by changing the consequence of the behavior.  Counterconditioning is developing a healthy response to stimuli.  Exposure is when the individual exposes themselves, either all-at-once or gradually, to what he or she fears.  Behavioral contract is a document formed between therapist and client outlining behavioral consequences.  Participant modeling is when the patient observes others behaving in the desired way.  Behavioral rehearsal is when the patient practices desired behaviors or reactions until he or she does them automatically.  Thought stopping is using behavioral queues to stop thoughts and insert more positive thoughts in their place. 

The Humanistic Approach

The humanistic approach developed in part from the “reductionistic aspects of early psychodynamic theory, which viewed all psychological symptoms as derived from sexual conflicts” (Plante, 2011, p. 50).  The humanistic approach was also derived from European philosophy and the work of mental health professionals such as Frank, Rogers, May, Maslow, and Perls.  The goals of humanistic approach is to “emphasize the importance of interpersonal connection, human freedom, and personal choice for emotional well-being” (Hansell & Damour, 2008, p. 49). 

Active listening is when the therapist listens intensely to the patient using reflection, summaries, and paraphrasing, in addition to other techniques.  Empathy conveys to the patient that he or she is being heard as well as understood.  Unconditional positive regard is the full acceptance of the thoughts and emotions of the patient.  Congruence gives the patient the sense that the therapist is being genuine.  Self-actualization is progression towards one’s fullest potential.  Peak experiences are points in time where self-actualization has been reached.  Visualization is a technique used during therapy where the patient visualizes an individual in an empty chair to say what they need to say to that individual. 

The Family Systems Approach

The family systems approach attempts to utilize the family as a whole to treat problematic behavior and emotions.  Before the 1950’s the family approach was foreign as psychologist only working with the patient suffering from OCD or other mental health disorders.  The family systems approach is rooted in the Bateson Project  of the 1950s.  Don Jackson founded the Mental Research Institute alongside another Virginia Satir, another family therapist, in 1959.  During the 1970’s especially, the family system approach became increasingly popular among mental health professionals. 

The goal of the family systems approach is to improve communication between family members, and bring attention to the whole family instead of the problems on one individual within the family.  “OCD is clearly a family affair yet many clinicians may not be attentive to family responses to OCD symptoms, how those responses facilitate the disorder and family dynamics that may result due to the impact of OCD on every member of the family” (International OCD foundation, 2012, para. 2).  Families tend to accommodate the rituals of individual’s with OCD, which makes the family systems approach extremely important to the remission and recovery of the individual suffering from OCD. 

Several techniques are using in the family systems approach such as reframing, paradoxical intention, joining, enmeshing, and disengagement.  Reframing is changing how the patient perceives a behavior.  Paradoxical intention is a technique where the patient actually acts out their problematic behavior in order to feel more comfortable with treatment options.  Joining is when the therapist becomes involved and apart of the family unit rather than an observer.  Enmeshment is when the patient suffering from OCD becomes over-involved and critical of other family member’s lives.  Disengagement is the detachment of a family member in an attempt to avoid emotional involvement. 

Conclusion

Obsessive-compulsive disorder is complex and different for each individual suffering from the disorder.  Each of the psychological approaches to OCD has pros and cons, which should be evaluated by the psychologist before beginning treatment.  The psychodynamic approach focuses on childhood development and unconscious causes and effects of the disorder.   The cognitive-behavioral approach focuses on the present behavior displayed and non-displayed by the patient suffering from OCD to better treat the problematic behaviors.  The humanistic approach assumes that the patient is innately good and encourages personal-growth and eventually self-actualization.  The family systems approach includes the family as a whole in the observation and treatment process without focusing directly on the patient suffering from OCD.  All of these treatment approached have good qualities and effective treatment plans.  It is up to the psychologist as to which one or ones he or she will incorporate in the patient’s treatment plan. 

References

Feist, J., & Feist, G. (2009). Theories of personality (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Hansell, J. & Damour, L. (2008). Abnormal psychology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

International ocd foundation. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.ocfoundation.org/


Plante, T. G. (2011). Contemporary clinical psychology (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Monday, May 5, 2014

Clinical Psychology

Clinical psychology will be examined with discussion on the history and evolution of clinical psychology.  The role of research and statistics in clinical psychology will be explained.  The difference between clinical psychology, social work, psychiatry, and school psychology will be examined. 

History and Evolution of Clinical Psychology
Before clinical psychology became a term there were people and events that set the stage for clinical psychology to become a profession.  The Greeks believed that illnesses were related to the gods.  Sigmund Freud developed the connection between body and mind, and the diseases could be brought about by emotional and unconscious influences.  “As more and more scientific discoveries were revealed, theories about the relative importance of biological, psychological, and social factors in behavior and emotions were altered to accommodate the most up-to-date discoveries and thinking.” (Plante, 2011, p. 45).  Clinical psychology was born in 1896 as a specialty with the first ever psychological clinic.  This clinic was located at the University of Pennsylvania and opened by Lightner Witner.  In 1908 the Binet-Simon scale was created by Alfred Binet and Theodore Simon for teachers and schools to assess and identify children with learning disabilities. 

Sigmund Freud had little influence on clinical psychology until his visit to a conference in the United States in 1909.  The conference influenced children’s psychological clinics in the US to adopt Sigmund’s psychoanalytic theories.  In 1917 clinical psychology was implemented into the U.S. Army with the use of verbal and nonverbal intelligence testing.  The military’s use of psychological testing increased the popularity of clinical psychology.  After World War I there was an explosion of psychological tests, making over 500 accessible in the United States by 1940 (Plante, 2011).  Hermann Rorschach developed the now-famous Psychodiagnostik inkblot test in 1921. 

Although the APA did nothing to enforce it, in 1935 the APA Committee on Standards and Training in Clinical Psychology did recommend a PhD as well as one year of internship be required of clinical psychologists (Plante, 2011).  In 1973 the new Vail model was accepted as a new training model, which was an addition to the already practiced Boulder model.  The PsyD was also accepted as an alternative to the PhD degree for practicing clinical psychology.    A major shift in clinical psychology occurred when a major lawsuit in the late 1980s allowed psychologists to perform psychoanalysis on his or her patients.  This testing led to more widespread consultation and therapy among clinical psychologists.  After more than 40,000 men were hospitalized following World War II there was an increase in clinical psychologists and their services. The VA then employed around 4,700 clinical psychologists in 1947. 

Research and Statistics in Clinical Psychology
Research is the core of clinical psychology, and without it clinical psychology would not have progressed like it has.  The scientific method is widely used by clinical psychologist to conduct research.  “The scientific method is a set of rules and procedures that describe, explain, and predict a particular phenomenon” (Plante, 2011, p. 74).  The phenomenon is first observed by the psychologist or group of psychologists.  Then a hypothesis is formed predicting the believed outcome.  The hypothesis is tested, then altered based on the findings of the testing, and then interpreted.  The DSM-IV-TR is a highly used tool published by the APA.  It is a manual of syndromes with specific diagnostic criteria for the syndromes (Plante, 2011).  This manual is used in research to make sure that all criteria match the specifications in the DSM, for best results.  Once a hypothesis is valid is can be used to explain behavior and predict future behavior. 

“All sciences demand results and are aimed at seeking empirical evidence which is favourable toward the hypothesis formulated, in such a way that they ensure predictable results.  Thus, psychological research seeks to obtain empirical evidence which will allow the hypothesis derived from the different theories postulated to be contrasted.  In order to achieve this aim, some good research designs and appropriate statistical methods must be established” (Sesé & Palmer, 2012, p. 97-98).

Statistics also play a key role in clinical psychology.  Statistics are used to support research hypotheses and their findings.  “Statistical significance refers to the very small probability of obtaining a particular finding by error or chance” (Plante, 2011, p. 96).  Statistics are used within the scientific method to help research psychologists to form their hypothesis, but more importantly statistics allow the research to be used in a broader term. Information can be taken from one experiment and, if it is valid, can be incorporated into other experiments.  Statistics also allow for information to be shared with others easily and legibly. 

Clinical Psychology and Other Mental Health Professions
Clinical psychology differs from other mental health professions.  At its core clinical psychology deals with the assessment and treatment of mental disabilities and illnesses.  Other disciplines may touch on the subject, but encompass an array of other topics that do not include mental illness.  “Social work practice is carried out in public, nonprofit, and for profit agencies and includes direct services to individuals, families, groups, and communities, as well as supervision, management, and policy analysis” (Gambrill, 2006, p. 4).  While psychiatrists do have extensive training in mental illness they focus more on behavioral aspects than clinical psychologists do.  Psychiatrists also specialize in medicine for mental and behavioral problems.  School psychology focuses on children and his or her mental abilities pertaining to achievement and interests.  If a student is having a issues with mental illness it is likely that the child would be referred to a clinical psychologist.  The school psychologist would be able to counsel the child, but would be limited in his or her ability to assess and treat the child for non-school related issues.

Conclusion
Clinical psychology has an extensive history and evolution dating back to its birth in 1896.  Other events took place before then leading to the term “clinical psychology” being coined.  Lightner Witner, Hermann Rorschach, Sigmund Freud, Alfred Binet, and Theodore Simon are just a few men who have greatly impacted the evolution of clinical psychology.  Research and statistics are the backbone of clinical psychology and its ever-evolving history.  Although other mental health professions may encompass parts of clinical psychology, it is the only field to deal with only mental disability and illness.  Clinical psychology has greatly improved the information that is now available to mental health professions. 






References
Gambrill, Eileen D.. (2006). Social Work Practice: A Critical Thinker's Guide. Oxford University Press, USA. Retrieved 5 May 2014, from <http://www.myilibrary.com?ID=65551>
Plante, T. G. (2011). Contemporary clinical psychology (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Sesé, A., & Palmer, A. (2012). The current use of statistics in clinical and health psychology under review. Clinica y Salud, 23(1), 97-108. doi: 10.5093/cl2012v23n1a2